These words of Soren Kierkegaard come to mind as I learn of the proposal to begin reclassifying biblioblogs as conservative, moderate, liberal, etc. You can look here, here, here, and here to read more about this and to see some initial reactions. I am in substantial agreement with the sentiment of these early reactions and I think this is an ill-conceived idea that significantly decreases the potential effectiveness of every biblioblogger. First, not every blogger breaks down neatly along such lines. Second, one man’s conservative is another man’s moderate. One man’s moderate is another man’s liberal. Such labels often do more harm than good and often bring with them a host of potentially negative assumptions.
Posted by: Peje Iesous | November 25, 2009
“If you label me, you negate me. . . .”
Posted in Biblioblogging community, Conservative, Hermeneutics, Liberal, Moderate
Leave a response
Categories
- April DeConick
- Audio lectures
- Bible translation
- Biblical Archaeology Review
- Biblioblogging community
- Bultmann
- Christopher Tuckett
- Community-Conflict Hypothesis
- Conservative
- Conservative Bible Project
- D. A. Carson
- Elizabeth Struthers Malbon
- End of the semester
- Exgetical papers
- Female biblioblogging
- Frank Matera
- Gospel of John
- Gospel of Mark
- Gospel of Thomas
- Grading
- Hermeneutics
- Historical Jesus
- Interviews
- Ismo Dunderberg
- Jimmy Dunn
- John Paul Meier
- Kelly Iverson
- Klyne Snodgrass
- Liberal
- Messianic secret
- Michael Bird
- Moderate
- My book
- Narrative criticism
- New Testament Theology
- Nicholas Perrin
- Non-canonical gospels
- Orality
- Parables of Jesus
- Performance criticism
- Random posts
- Sahidic
- Scholarship
- Society of Biblical Literature
- Solving mysteries
- Starting out
- Stephen J. Patterson
- Stevan Davies
- Swine flu
- Synoptic Problem
- Synoptics
- Teaching
- Theological interpretation
- Thomasine scholarship
- Udo Schnelle
- Uwe-Karsten Plisch
- William Wrede
