Skip to content

Orality, the “Kernel,” Accretions, and Dating Thomas (Part I)

December 2, 2009

It may be a little premature, but I believe I am dangerously close to “drinking the Kool-Aid” on this one. While I have expressed some disagreements with April DeConick over the John-Thomas issue both on this blog and in print, I still find her work immensely helpful for my own research on the Gospel of Thomas. In fact, as I re-read her Recovering the Original Gospel of Thomas in preparation for a chapter I am writing, I find her argument for dating the traditions in Thomas compelling. Today as I sat in the Norfolk International Airport en route to Baltimore I was struck once again by her argument that the Thomasine traditions which deal with James reveal a great deal about possible stages in the life of the community (notice: I applied the word “stages” to the community and not the sayings tradition because DeConick objects when some equate her “accretions” with concrete stages; I don’t want to be accused of misrepresenting her view). Whereas one logion suggests that James is still around and in charge, another suggests that he is not. If his death can be dated to 62 CE, then this argues for an early tradition (part of DeConick’s “Kernel”) existing prior to 62. Does it go all the way back to 50? I don’t know if I’m convinced. What about 30? Definitely not convinced. But she does make a compelling case for a handful of pre-70 (and thus pre-Markan) traditions in the final form of Thomas. In the next few posts I want to consider this position in greater detail.

One Comment leave one →
  1. Frank McCoy permalink
    December 2, 2009 8:37 pm

    Even with a process of gradual accretion, one can still meaningfully speak of discrete stages or strata. Here in St Paul, in the Ordovician Period, there was a transgression of the sea, with a gradual accretion of first beach sand and then a transition over to silt and, finally, a transition over to precipitating calcium carbonate. Despite this process of gradual accretion, geologists still divide it into three strata: (1) a basal St Peter sandstone which is white, (2) the Glenville formation, which grades upward from sand to silt and is grey-green and (3) an uppermost Platteville limestone that is tan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 686 other followers